|
.
Use also might include
mixing marijuana in food or brewing it as a tea. As a more
concentrated, resinous form it is called hashish and, as
a sticky black liquid, hash oil. Marijuana smoke has a pungent
and distinctive, usually sweet-and-sour odor. There are
countless street terms for marijuana including pot, herb,
weed, grass, widow, ganja, and hash, as well as terms derived
from trademarked varieties of cannabis, such as Bubble Gum®,
Northern Lights®, Juicy Fruit®, Afghani #1®, and a number
of Skunk varieties.
The main active chemical in marijuana is THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol).
The membranes of certain nerve cells in the brain contain
protein receptors that bind to THC. Once securely in place,
THC kicks off a series of cellular reactions that ultimately
lead to the high that users experience when they smoke marijuana.
Extent of Use
There were an estimated 2.6 million new marijuana users
in 2001. This number is similar to the numbers of new users
each year since 1995, but above the number in 1990 (1.6
million). In 2002, over 14 million Americans age 12 and
older used marijuana at least once in the month prior to
being surveyed, and 12.2 percent of past year marijuana
users used marijuana on 300 or more days in the past 12
months. This translates into 3.1 million people using marijuana
on a daily or almost daily basis over a 12-month period(1).
The percentage of youth age 12 to 17 who had ever used marijuana
declined slightly from 2001 to 2002 (21.9 to 20.6 percent).
Among adults age 18 to 25, the rate increased slightly from
53.0 percent to 53.8 percent in 2002. The percentage of
young adults age 18 to 25 who had ever used marijuana was
5.1 percent in 1965, but increased steadily to 54.4 percent
in 1982. Although the rate for young adults declined somewhat
from 1982 to 1993, it did not drop below 43 percent and
actually increased to 53.8 percent by 2002(1).
Forty-two percent of youth age 12 or 13 and 24.1 percent
age 16 or 17 perceived smoking marijuana once a month as
a great risk. Slightly more than half of youth age 12 to
17 indicated that it would be fairly or very easy to obtain
marijuana, but only 26.0 percent of 12- or 13-year-olds
indicated the same thing. However, 79.0 percent of those
age 16 or 17 indicated that it would be fairly or very easy
to obtain marijuana(1).
Prevalence of lifetime, past year, and past month marijuana
use declined among students in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades
in 2003. However, the declines in 12-month prevalence reached
statistical significance only in 8th-graders; past year
use has declined by nearly one-third since 1996(2).
All three grades showed an increase in perceived risk for
regular marijuana use. This finding represents a welcome
turnaround in this perception, which has been in decline
in all grades over the past 1 or 2 years(3).
In 2002, marijuana was the third most commonly abused drug
mentioned in drug-related hospital emergency department
(ED) visits in the continental United States. Marijuana
mentions rose significantly (24%) from 2000 to 2002, but
showed no significant increase since 2001. Taking changes
in population into account, marijuana mentions increased
139 percent from 1995 to 2002(4).
Effects on the Brain
Scientists have learned a great deal about how THC acts
in the brain to produce its many effects. When someone smokes
marijuana, THC rapidly passes from the lungs into the bloodstream,
which carries the chemical to organs throughout the body,
including the brain.
In the brain, THC connects to specific sites called cannabinoid
receptors on nerve cells and influences the activity of
those cells. Some brain areas have many cannabinoid receptors;
others have few or none. Many cannabinoid receptors are
found in the parts of the brain that influence pleasure,
memory, thought, concentration, sensory and time perception,
and coordinated movement(5).
The short-term effects of marijuana can include problems
with memory and learning; distorted perception; difficulty
in thinking and problem solving; loss of coordination; and
increased heart rate. Research findings for long-term marijuana
use indicate some changes in the brain similar to those
seen after long-term use of other major drugs of abuse.
For example, cannabinoid (THC or synthetic forms of THC)
withdrawal in chronically exposed animals leads to an increase
in the activation of the stress-response system(6)
and changes in the activity of nerve cells containing dopamine(7).
Dopamine neurons are involved in the regulation of motivation
and reward, and are directly or indirectly affected by all
drugs of abuse.
Effects on the Heart
One study has indicated that a user’s risk of heart
attack more than quadruples in the first hour after smoking
marijuana(8). The researchers suggest
that such an effect might occur from marijuana’s effects
on blood pressure and heart rate and reduced oxygen-carrying
capacity of blood.
Effects on the Lungs
A study of 450 individuals found that people who smoke marijuana
frequently but do not smoke tobacco have more health problems
and miss more days of work than nonsmokers(9).
Many of the extra sick days among the marijuana smokers
in the study were for respiratory illnesses.
Even infrequent use can cause burning and stinging of the
mouth and throat, often accompanied by a heavy cough. Someone
who smokes marijuana regularly may have many of the same
respiratory problems that tobacco smokers do, such as daily
cough and phlegm production, more frequent acute chest illness,
a heightened risk of lung infections, and a greater tendency
to obstructed airways(10). Smoking
marijuana increases the likelihood of developing cancer
of the head or neck, and the more marijuana smoked the greater
the increase(11). A study comparing
173 cancer patients and 176 healthy individuals produced
strong evidence that marijuana smoking doubled or tripled
the risk of these cancers.
Marijuana use also has the potential to promote cancer of
the lungs and other parts of the respiratory tract because
it contains irritants and carcinogens(12,
13). In fact, marijuana smoke contains 50 to 70 percent
more carcinogenic hydrocarbons than does tobacco smoke(14).
It also produces high levels of an enzyme that converts
certain hydrocarbons into their carcinogenic form—levels
that may accelerate the changes that ultimately produce
malignant cells(15). Marijuana users
usually inhale more deeply and hold their breath longer
than tobacco smokers do, which increases the lungs’
exposure to carcinogenic smoke. These facts suggest that,
puff for puff, smoking marijuana may increase the risk of
cancer more than smoking tobacco.
Other Health Effects
Some of marijuana’s adverse health effects may occur
because THC impairs the immune system’s ability to
fight off infectious diseases and cancer. In laboratory
experiments that exposed animal and human cells to THC or
other marijuana ingredients, the normal disease-preventing
reactions of many of the key types of immune cells were
inhibited(16). In other studies, mice
exposed to THC or related substances were more likely than
unexposed mice to develop bacterial infections and tumors(17,
18).
Effects of Heavy Marijuana Use on Learning and Social
Behavior
Depression(19), anxiety(20),
and personality disturbances(21) have
been associated with marijuana use. Research clearly demonstrates
that marijuana has potential to cause problems in daily
life or make a person’s existing problems worse. Because
marijuana compromises the ability to learn and remember
information, the more a person uses marijuana the more he
or she is likely to fall behind in accumulating intellectual,
job, or social skills. Moreover, research has shown that
marijuana’s adverse impact on memory and learning
can last for days or weeks after the acute effects of the
drug wear off(22, 23).
Students who smoke marijuana get lower grades and are less
likely to graduate from high school, compared with their
non-smoking peers(24, 25, 26, 27).
A study of 129 college students found that, for heavy users
of marijuana (those who smoked the drug at least 27 of the
preceding 30 days), critical skills related to attention,
memory, and learning were significantly impaired even after
they had not used the drug for at least 24 hours(28).
The heavy marijuana users in the study had more trouble
sustaining and shifting their attention and in registering,
organizing, and using information than did the study participants
who had used marijuana no more than 3 of the previous 30
days. As a result, someone who smokes marijuana every day
may be functioning at a reduced intellectual level all of
the time.
More recently, the same researchers showed that the ability
of a group of long-term heavy marijuana users to recall
words from a list remained impaired for a week after quitting,
but returned to normal within 4 weeks(29).
Thus, it is possible that some cognitive abilities may be
restored in individuals who quit smoking marijuana, even
after long-term heavy use.
Workers who smoke marijuana are more likely than their coworkers
to have problems on the job. Several studies associate workers’
marijuana smoking with increased absences, tardiness, accidents,
workers’ compensation claims, and job turnover. A
study of municipal workers found that those who used marijuana
on or off the job reported more “withdrawal behaviors”—such
as leaving work without permission, daydreaming, spending
work time on personal matters, and shirking tasks—that
adversely affect productivity and morale(30).
In another study, marijuana users reported that use of the
drug impaired several important measures of life achievement
including cognitive abilities, career status, social life,
and physical and mental health(31).
Effects on Pregnancy
Research has shown that babies born to women who used marijuana
during their pregnancies display altered responses to visual
stimuli, increased tremulousness, and a high-pitched cry,
which may indicate neurological problems in development(32).
During infancy and preschool years, marijuana-exposed children
have been observed to have more behavioral problems than
unexposed children and poorer performance on tasks of visual
perception, language comprehension, sustained attention,
and memory(33, 34). In school, these
children are more likely to exhibit deficits in decision-making
skills, memory, and the ability to remain attentive(35,
36, 37).
Addictive Potential
Long-term marijuana use can lead to addiction for some people;
that is, they use the drug compulsively even though it interferes
with family, school, work, and recreational activities.
Drug craving and withdrawal symptoms can make it hard for
long-term marijuana smokers to stop using the drug. People
trying to quit report irritability, sleeplessness, and anxiety(38).
They also display increased aggression on psychological
tests, peaking approximately one week after the last use
of the drug(39).
Genetic Vulnerability
Scientists have found that whether an individual has positive
or negative sensations after smoking marijuana can be influenced
by heredity. A 1997 study demonstrated that identical male
twins were more likely than non-identical male twins to
report similar responses to marijuana use, indicating a
genetic basis for their response to the drug(40).
(Identical twins share all of their genes.)
It also was discovered that the twins’ shared or family
environment before age 18 had no detectable influence on
their response to marijuana. Certain environmental factors,
however, such as the availability of marijuana, expectations
about how the drug would affect them, the influence of friends
and social contacts, and other factors that differentiate
experiences of identical twins were found to have an important
effect.
Treating Marijuana Problems
The latest treatment data indicate that, in 2000, marijuana
was the primary drug of abuse in about 15 percent (236,638)
of all admissions to treatment facilities in the United
States. Marijuana admissions were primarily male (76 percent),
White (57 percent), and young (46 percent under 20 years
old). Those in treatment for primary marijuana use had begun
use at an early age; 56 percent had used it by age 14 and
92 percent had used it by 18(41).
One study of adult marijuana users found comparable benefits
from a 14-session cognitive-behavioral group treatment and
a 2-session individual treatment that included motivational
interviewing and advice on ways to reduce marijuana use.
Participants were mostly men in their early thirties who
had smoked marijuana daily for more than 10 years. By increasing
patients’ awareness of what triggers their marijuana
use, both treatments sought to help patients devise avoidance
strategies. Use, dependence symptoms, and psychosocial problems
decreased for at least 1 year following both treatments;
about 30 percent of users were abstinent during the last
3-month followup period(42).
Another study suggests that giving patients vouchers that
they can redeem for goods—such as movie passes, sporting
equipment, or vocational training—may further improve
outcomes(43).
Although no medications are currently available for treating
marijuana abuse, recent discoveries about the workings of
the THC receptors have raised the possibility of eventually
developing a medication that will block the intoxicating
effects of THC. Such a medication might be used to prevent
relapse to marijuana abuse by lessening or eliminating its
appeal.
Percentage of 8th-Graders Who Have Used Marijuana:
Monitoring the Future Study, 2003
|
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
|
Ever
Used |
16.7% |
19.9% |
23.1% |
22.6% |
22.2% |
22.0% |
20.3% |
20.4% |
19.2% |
17.5% |
|
Used
in Past Year |
13.0 |
15.8 |
18.3 |
17.7 |
16.9 |
16.5 |
15.6 |
15.4 |
14.6 |
12.8 |
|
Used
in Past Month |
7.8 |
9.1 |
11.3 |
10.2 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
9.1 |
9.2 |
8.3 |
7.5 |
|
Daily
Use in Past Month |
0.7 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
|
Percentage of 10th-Graders Who Have Used Marijuana:
Monitoring the Future Study, 2003
|
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
|
Ever
Used |
30.4% |
34.1% |
39.8% |
42.3% |
39.6% |
40.9% |
40.3% |
40.1% |
38.7% |
36.4% |
|
Used
in Past Year |
25.2 |
28.7 |
33.6 |
34.8 |
31.1 |
32.1 |
32.2 |
32.7 |
30.3 |
28.2 |
|
Used
in Past Month |
15.8 |
17.2 |
20.4 |
20.5 |
18.7 |
19.4 |
19.7 |
19.8 |
17.8 |
17.0 |
|
Daily
Use in Past Month |
2.2 |
2.8 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
4.5 |
3.9 |
3.6 |
|
Percentage of 12th-Graders Who Have Used Marijuana
Monitoring the Future Study, 2003
|
|
1979 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
|
Ever Used |
60.4% |
36.7% |
32.6% |
35.3% |
38.2% |
41.7% |
44.9% |
|
Used in Past Year |
50.8 |
23.9 |
21.9 |
26.0 |
30.7 |
34.7 |
35.8 |
|
Used in Past Month |
36.5 |
13.8 |
11.9 |
15.5 |
19.0 |
21.2 |
21.9 |
|
Daily Use in Past Month |
10.3 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
3.6 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
|
|
|
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
|
Ever Used |
49.6% |
49.1% |
49.7% |
48.8% |
49.0% |
47.8% |
46.1% |
|
Used in Past Year |
38.5 |
37.5 |
37.8 |
36.5 |
37.0 |
36.2 |
34.9 |
|
Used in Past Month |
23.7 |
22.8 |
23.1 |
21.6 |
22.4 |
21.5 |
21.2 |
|
Daily Use in Past Month |
5.8 |
5.6 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
5.8 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
|
These data are from the
2003 Monitoring the Future (MTF) Survey, funded by National
Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health,
DHHS, and conducted by the University of Michigan’s
Institute for Social Research. The survey has tracked 12th-graders’
illicit drug use and related attitudes since 1975; in 1991,
8th- and 10th-graders were added to the study. The latest
data are online at www.drugabuse.gov.
1 NSDUH (formerly known as the National
Household Survey on Drug Abuse) is an annual survey conducted
by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Copies of the latest survey are available from the National
Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information at 1-800-729-6686.
2 These data are from the 2003 Monitoring the Future Survey,
funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National
Institutes of Health, DHHS, and conducted by the University
of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research. The survey
has tracked 12th-graders’ illicit drug use and related
attitudes since 1975; in 1991, 8th- and 10th-graders were
added to the study. The latest data are online at
www.drugabuse.gov.
3 These data are from the 2003 Monitoring the Future Survey.
4 These data are from the annual Drug Abuse Warning Network,
funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, DHHS. The survey provides information about
emergency department visits that are induced by or related
to the use of an illicit drug or the nonmedical use of a
legal drug. The latest data (2002) are available at 1-800-729-6686
or online at www.samhsa.gov.
5 Herkenham M, Lynn A, Little MD, Johnson MR, et al: Cannabinoid
receptor localization in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci,
USA 87:1932-1936, 1990.
6 Rodriguez de Fonseca F, et al: Activation of cortocotropin-releasing
factor in the limbic system during cannabinoid withdrawal.
Science 276(5321):2050-2064, 1997.
7 Diana M, Melis M, Muntoni AL, et al: Mesolimbic dopaminergic
decline after cannabinoid withdrawal. Proc Natl Acad Sci
95:10269-10273, 1998.
8 Mittleman MA, Lewis RA, Maclure M, et al: Triggering myocardial
infarction by marijuana. Circulation 103:2805-2809, 2001.
9 Polen MR, Sidney S, Tekawa IS, et al: Health care use
by frequent marijuana smokers who do not smoke tobacco.
West J Med 158:596-601, 1993.
10 Tashkin DP: Pulmonary complications of smoked substance
abuse. West J Med 152:525-530, 1990.
11 Zhang ZF, Morgenstern H, Spitz MR, et al: Marijuana use
and increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head
and neck. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
6:1071-1078, 1999.
12 Ibid ref 10.
13 Sridhar KS, Raub WA, Weatherby, NL Jr, et al: Possible
role of marijuana smoking as a carcinogen in the development
of lung cancer at a young age. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
26(3):285-288, 1994.
14 Hoffman D, Brunnemann KD, Gori GB, et al: On the carcinogenicity
of marijuana smoke. In: VC Runeckles, ed, Recent Advances
in Phytochemistry. New York. Plenum, 1975.
15 Cohen S: Adverse effects of marijuana: selected issues.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 362:119-124,
1981.
16 Adams IB, Martin BR: Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology
in animals and humans. Addiction 91:1585-1614, 1996.
17 Klein TW, Newton C, Friedman H: Resistance to Legionella
pneumophila suppressed by the marijuana component, tetrahydrocannabinol.
J Infectious Disease 169:1177-1179, 1994.
18 Zhu L, Stolina M, Sharma S, et al: Delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol
inhibits antitumor immunity by a CB2 receptor-mediated,
cytokine-dependent pathway. J Immunology, 2000, pp. 373-380.
19 Brook JS, et al: The effect of early marijuana use on
later anxiety and depressive symptoms. NYS Psychologist,
January 2001, pp. 35-39.
20 Green BE, Ritter C: Marijuana use and depression. J Health
Soc Behav 41(1):40-49, 2000.
21 Brook JS, Cohen P, Brook DW: Longitudinal study of co-occurring
psychiatric disorders and substance use. J Acad Child and
Adolescent Psych 37:322-330, 1998.
22 Pope HG, Yurgelun-Todd D: The residual cognitive effects
of heavy marijuana use in college students. JAMA 272(7):521-527,
1996.
23 Block RI, Ghoneim MM: Effects of chronic marijuana use
on human cognition. Psychopharmacology 100(1-2):219-228,
1993.
24 Lynskey M, Hall W: The effects of adolescent cannabis
use on educational attainment: a review. Addiction 95(11):1621-1630,
2000.
25 Kandel DB, Davies M: High school students who use crack
and other drugs. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53(1):71-80, 1996.
26 Rob M, Reynolds I, Finlayson PF: Adolescent marijuana
use: risk factors and implications. Aust NZ J Psychiatry
24(1):45-56, 1990.
27 Brook JS, Balka EB, Whiteman M: The risks for late adolescence
of early adolescent marijuana use. Am J Public Health 89(10):1549-1554,
1999.
28 Ibid ref 22.
29 Pope, Gruber, Hudson, et al: Neuropsychological performance
in long-term cannabis users. Archives of General Psychiatry.
30 Lehman WE, Simpson DD: Employee substance abuse and on-the-job
behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology 77(3):309-321,
1992.
31 Gruber, AJ, Pope HG, Hudson HI, Yurgelun-Todd D: Attributes
of long-term heavy cannabis users: A case control study.
Psychological Medicine 33:1415-1422, 2003.
32 Lester, BM; Dreher, M: Effects of marijuana use during
pregnancy on newborn cry. Child Development 60:764-771,
1989.
33 Fried, PA: The Ottawa prenatal prospective study (OPPS):
methodological issues and findings—it’s easy
to throw the baby out with the bath water. Life Sciences
56:2159-2168, 1995.
34 Fried, PA: Prenatal exposure to marihuana and tobacco
during infancy, early and middle childhood: effects and
an attempt at synthesis. Arch Toxicol Supp 17:233-60, 1995.
35 Ibid ref 33.
36 Ibid ref 34.
37 Cornelius MD, Taylor PM, Geva D, et al: Prenatal tobacco
and marijuana use among adolescents: effects on offspring
gestational age, growth, and morphology. Pediatrics 95:738-743,
1995.
38 Kouri EM, Pope HG, Lukas SE: Changes in aggressive behavior
during withdrawal from long-term marijuana use. Psychopharmacology
143:302-308, 1999.
39 Haney M, Ward AS, Comer SD, et al: Abstinence symptoms
following smoked marijuana in humans. Psychopharmacology
141:395-404, 1999.
40 Lyons MJ, et al: Addiction 92(4):409-417, 1997.
41 These data from the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)
1992-2000: National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment
Services, November 2001, funded by the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Service Administration, DHHS. The latest data
are available at 1-800-729-6686 or online at www.samhsa.gov.
42 Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Curtin L: Comparison of extended
versus brief treatments for marijuana use. J Consult Clin
Psychol 68(5):898-908, 2000.
43 Budney AJ, Higgins ST, Radonovich KJ, et al: Adding voucher-based
incentives to coping skills and motivational enhancement
improves outcomes during treatment for marijuana dependence.
J Consult Clin Psychol 68(6):1051-1061, 2000. |